Thursday, 15 April 2010
the new diplomacy
In my opinion, public opinion is the most important aspect of the new diplomacy for the reason that it is definitely a source of power. While classical diplomacy only involved governments’ representatives and leaves a passive public to rely on their bilateral decisions, new diplomacy opens its door to a large informal diplomats and gives a voice to various extremely active actors including non -governmental organizations and particular individuals. In my view, it is the power accorded to public in the political arena that creates opportunities for non-governmental actors to expand their influence in diplomatic processes, as public diplomacy requires transparency and cooperation when it encourages debate. To me even multilateral diplomacy would be irrelevant without the public’s pressure since NGOs play in important part in multilateral processes. Of course, living in an era where interconnection and fast communication dominate as noted by Snow it is “the rise in user-friendly communication technologies that have increased public participation in talking about foreign affairs” (Snow 2009: 6), indeed, globalization is causing the centre of diplomatic gravity to move “(Copeland 2009:166) from isolation and secrecy of governments to the public's sphere of influence.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I like your argument about the importance of public opinion. It is certainly true that NGO's have had an incredible effect on diplomatic practice also. However maybe when it comes to high politics such as the decision to go to war, public opinion takes a back seat, arguably as was the case with Iraq.
ReplyDeleteI DO AGREE WITH YOU THAT ULTIMATELY STATES MAKE THE DECISIONS AND THEIR PERSONAL INTEREST UNTIL NOW TRANSCENDED PUBLIC OPINION. HOWEVER WITH THE GROWING INETRDEPENDENCE AND THE SECURITY THREAT THAT TERRORISM REPRESENTS, I BELIEVE PUBLIC OPINION WILL BE VALUED BECAUSE HARD POWER IS NOT ENOUGH TO ELIMINATE TERRORISM, SUPPORT FROM THE PUBLIC IS VITAL.
ReplyDeleteBoth your arguments are right depending on the situation. As much as public opinion is valued, its impact on certain issues does not really bring solutions and it is always up to the government to take the final decision. Terrorism is a good example and the case of Iraq just shows that the ultimate decision-taker is the government.However,in diplomacy, it is an important tool especially in the role it plays in public diplomacy,which is vital in democratic regimes.
ReplyDelete